Press "Enter" to skip to content

Choosing Nina Angelovska: A chance for youth or a Cabinet bandstand correction

04.09.2019

Nina Angelovska had her first press conference as Minister of Finance. She appeared alongside the man who himself wanted to be finance minister. For a short time, Zaev had a dual role, when besides being the head of government, he also covered the finance sector. But when he could no longer be prime minister and minister, he gave a chance to Nina Angelovska. Angelovska says that she is the right person for the position because the ministry lacked a good manager.

by Saska Cvetkovska, Denica Chadikovska

Prime Minister Zoran Zaev’s long-awaited staff broom has not brought any drastic news. Controversial personnel like Sadula Duraki for example, not only went unpunished, but also got bigger positions, in his case – the deputy prime minister’s chair. With every change of directors or ministers presented, the administration of the SDSM and DUI coalition has been more criticized than praised.

On the other hand, government officials whose mandate was not disputed in public were removed from their posts. Dragan Tevdovski, the former finance minister is one of these people. While he was the head of Finance, there were various reactions to his work as well. It was speculated that he is not a favorite among big business or that he does not understand SDSM’s vision for the economy, and that he is more of a theorist than a skilled macro-economist. In any case, Tevdovski was generally regarded as a decent and honorable official.

Senior party sources from the party leadership, speaking with two IRL journalists, argued that Zoran Zaev has his own vision of macroeconomic processes.

“They have common respect with Tevdovski and have worked great together, but I think that in some areas they did not have and understanding on the common vision. The President has some ideas that he wants to implement, of course with all the professional help from the people in the Ministry,” says a senior official in SDSM.

The exact reasons for his dismissal remain unknown, but a few months before Zoran Zaev announced Nina Angelovska known as “Nina Grouper ” (as the company she founded), the public was in a mild shock as Zaev announced himself as finance minister and prime minister at the same time. State Committee On Prevention Of Corruption slammed that there is a conflict of interest. The search for a new minister has begun. The names that surfaced included the acting governor Anita Bezhovska Angelovska and Tatiana Sterjova. Nina Angelovska won.

Merit challenge

Nina Angelovska was elected as new finance minister in the Assembly on Saturday with 64 votes in favor and 18 against. She is a young and undoubtedly successful entrepreneur. One of the founders of the company Grouper – the first Macedonian online coupon service. But her rich summary lacks significant monetary policy experiences and engagements, as well as work in financial institutions. Prime Minister Zoran Zaev sells Angelovska’s election as a chance for young people, as a final inclusion of those not involved in the decision-making process.

“Nina Angelovska, who I recommend, is 31 years old. I want to send a message to the young people, to find their place everywhere, in all jobs and even in such high positions that our country can offer. She started her doctoral studies in 2013 and in 2016 she holds a PhD in organizational sciences and management at UKIM. She put her acquired knowledge into practice and launched the first group discount website “Grouper.mk”. She experienced huge success, became a market leader and gained a lot of accolades, ” Zaev said about Angelovska.

Opponents mostly debate her youth. There were also chauvinistic attacks. Supporters, meanwhile, advocated that young people should be given a chance. Few have talked about a merit and competence system whereby one gets the chance to run one of the most powerful departments in government and manage the citizens’ money.

Image PR director, Angela Peeva Laurencic tells the IRL she does not understand why so much dust is rising for Nina Angelovska.

“She’s not that young. It is about a successful woman coming from the real sector who is young and ambitious. She left her business behind to work for the state. Why is she being tried before delivering results? The message Government sends with her engagement as a minister is beautiful. Angelovska has decided to bite and fight, and we need such successful and ambitious people,” says Laurencic.

Much has been said about her age, but so far no one has addressed questions about her experience and qualifications in one of the most serious sectors in the country.

Slagjana Taseva, president of Transparency International, cites the lack of a system of competence as the main problem.

“I don’t know her, I haven’t met the new finance minister. Whether she will withstand political interference is a matter of integrity. If she doesn’t like how decisions are made, she can and will go. Everything is politics in the country and this is an improvisation. In terms of being young, we’ve had prime ministers being 29 years old, and that is the most important post. The problem is we didn’t build a system of competence,” Taseva told the IRL.

Nina Angelovska runs a successful small company with 12 employees, with revenues up to 370,000 euros last year and profit of 120,000 euros. Now she has the budget of the Republic of Northern Macedonia in her hands.

The IRL reporter at today’s press conference in the Government asked Angelovska about her experience in macroeconomics, considering that managing a small company budget and managing the state budget is very different.

Angelovska replied that she’s aware that she’s different profile from previous people who held this responsible position so far. She did not address the public dilemmas surrounding her expertise in working with financial institutions. She said that is why she will have a team and she would manage.

“I know that macroeconomics is an extremely complex area and no one has ever run an institution alone. We are talking about managing an institution that requires quick decisions based on good information and good analysis, and in managing I think that I have proved both theoretical and practical,” Angelovska added.

Additional Reporting by Vlatko Chalovski, David Ilieski

Повеќе од DailyПовеќе теми во Daily »
Повеќе од Homepage leftПовеќе теми во Homepage left »
Sashka Cvetkovska

Sashka Cvetkovska

Еditor-in-chief

Sashka Cvetkovska is an internationally awarded investigative journalist and editor-in-chief of the Investigative Reporting Lab. Cvetkovska has worked on a number of national and cross-border investigations that have uncovered domestic and international crime, corruption, illicit arms trafficking and disinformation wars. The research she has worked on has been published in The Guardian, Buzzfeed, Süddeutsche Zeitung and others. Her current responsibilities are focused on increasing the impact of investigative reporting by creating new narratives of stories through film and campaigns. In that direction, she currently holds the position of producer of the Investigative documentary series Newsroom. For ten years, Cvetkovska has been part of the research team of the International Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, an international media organization associated with IRL. She was a member of the Board of Directors of OCCRP and the Association of Journalists of Macedonia.

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska

Editor for Development and Operations

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska is the co-founder of IRL and together with the editor and his assistant, is responsible for monitoring and designing the implementation process of IRL activities. She is the project director of the documentary series Newsroom. She has been working with journalists for more than 10 years and has also worked on other technological solutions that allow more efficiency when searching public databases used by our reporters in order to make their work faster. She is a software engineer and graphic designer by profession and she is also the first technology expert who is trained and works in the field of media. She is part of the cross-border group of technological experts of OCCRP and contributes in collecting and analyzing information and as a researcher in IRL.

Bojan Stojanovski

Bojan Stojanovski

Editor and journalist

Bojan Stojanovski is a graduated journalist with over ten years of media experience. He worked in several national televisions – TV Alfa, TV 24 Vesti and TV Alsat. From first of November 2021, he is a part of the IRL team. Throughout his career, Stojanovski followed topics in the field of judiciary, crime, corruption. In 2013, he received “Nikola Mladenov” award for investigative journalism, on the topic “Employment in the public administration through the party list”.

Denica Chadikovska

Denica Chadikovska

Assistant managing editor for organization and communications

Denica Chadikovska is a graduated psychologist who started her journalistic career in 2017 as co-author and co-producer of the youth show Krik, funded by the UK Government. Chadikovska becomes part of the IRL team in 2018 as an investigative journalist – intern within the project for training future media leaders. In June 2020, she joins the position of communications officer in charge of implementing the IRL’s communications strategy as part of the communications and products team.

Maja Jovanovska

Maja Jovanovska

Researcher and journalist

Maja Jovanovska has a degree in journalism and follows topics in the field of corruption, crime and justice. In her long-term career, she worked in numerous media such as A1 television, Channel 5 television, Alsat and the NOVAtv portal before joining the founding board of IRL in 2018. She is the winner of domestic recognitions and awards and has participated in a number of trainings and conferences in the field of investigative journalism. She was a member of the management of the Independent Union of Journalists and Media Workers of Macedonia and the Council of Ethics in the Media in Macedonia, and is currently part of the management of ZNM.

Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska

Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska

Researcher and journalist

Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska is a graduated journalist with ten years of experience. She worked in the daily newspaper Nova Makedonija, the Meta.mk news agency and the NOVATV portal. During her career, she worked on topics from the field of politics, urbanism, judiciary and corruption. She started working with investigative journalism in 2015 when she came to work as a reporter in the investigative newsroom of NOVATV. She is a participant in dozens of conferences and workshops on investigative journalism and is the author of the first undercover investigative story in Macedonia about the lives of the children from the May 25 home.

Aleksandar Janev

Aleksandar Janev

Researcher and journalist

Aleksandar Janev is a graduated economist who began his career as an economic journalist in 2008 at Alfa Television. He developed his professional reporting skills through training sessions with top economic journalists both domestically and abroad, including at Reuters in the United Kingdom. In 2010, he transitioned to the print media at Capital, where he worked until 2022. Concurrently, he contributed regularly to the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN), and since 2018, he has been both an author and editor for the TV program “Agenda 35” broadcasted on Macedonian Radio Television. Since 2023, he has been a part of the IRL team focusing on corruption and economic crime.

Ivan Blazhevski

Ivan Blazhevski

Researcher and journalist

Ivan Blazhevski is a journalist specializing in international relations, crime, and corruption. He has been working as a journalist since 1998, and since 2001, he has been an editor and correspondent for the Spanish state news agency EFE covering Macedonia, Albania, and Kosovo. Throughout his extensive career, Blazhevski has contributed to numerous media outlets such as Makpress, Agence France-Presse (AFP), Vecer, Dnevnik, Vreme, and Radio Free Europe, serving as editor for news and documentary programs at TV ALSAT for 18 years. He joined the team at IRL in 2024. Blazhevski has been honored with an investigative journalism award from the Macedonian Institute for Media (MIM) and has produced television programs in multiple countries and regions, including Japan, Greenland, Bolivia, China, Nepal, Bangladesh, East Africa, Cuba, Peru, Denmark, Italy, Germany, among others.

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova

Researcher and journalist

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova is a journalist with over 16 years of experience in the media industry. She began her career at the daily newspaper “Shpic” in 2008 and later worked at the weekly “Sega”. Since 2009, she has been part of the team at Radio Free Europe’s Macedonian language service, reporting on politics, crime, corruption, and economics across various media platforms. Since 2024, she has been employed at IRL as an investigative journalist. She holds a degree from the Faculty of Philosophy and continued her education at the School of Journalism at the Macedonian Institute for Media (MIM). Throughout her career, she has been involved in projects focused on educating and mentoring young journalists.

Luka Blazev

Luka Blazev

Graphic designer

Luka Blazev is a graphic designer at IRL who becomes part of the team in 2019. His career in the field of graphic design and art began in 2017 by working on several projects for various domestic and foreign companies. At IRL, Blazev is in charge of finding graphic solutions for the research and for the design of the promotional content resulting from the research, which follows the communication strategy of IRL.

Trifun Sitnikovski

Trifun Sitnikovski

Director of "Newsroom"

Trifun Sitnikovski has been working in the film industry for more than a decade. He has shot more than a dozen short action films, short documentaries and three TV series on which he worked as screenwriter, director and executive producer. In addition to directing films, he has also worked on numerous projects as a producer, editor, cinematographer, assistant director and script supervisor for short films, TV shows, documentaries, commercials and music videos. His latest project as a director and screenwriter is the documentary series “Newsroom”.

Trajce Antonovski

Trajce Antonovski

Cinematographer

Trajce Antonovski is a cameraman and part of the cinematographers of the documentary series Newsroom. Antonovski has been working for more than 10 years on the visual realization of sports competitions under the auspices of UEFA and EHF. He worked in the newsroom of A1 and the NOVATV portal, and was part of the team for the realization of the political shows “Eurozum”, “Provereno”, as well as numerous entertainment projects such as the popular quiz “Who wants to be a millionaire”, “50-50 ” and other projects. In IRL Macedonia, he is part of the team in charge of filming the stories.

Gorjan Atanasov

Gorjan Atanasov

Video editor and producer

Gorjan Atanasov is a film and TV video editor with more than 8 years of experience in the film and television industry. Atanasov has worked on several features and documentary projects. As an editor, he has signed 6 short feature films, 2 feature-length documentaries, and currently he works in IRL as a video editor for the documentary series “Newsroom” and short video stories and multimedia projects of the organization.

The “Postal Bank” case dates back more than two decades. For just as long, investigators have examined the privatization of the country’s first state bank. The case was reopened in 2018 by the then Special Public Prosecutor’s Office (SPO). After the dissolution of the SPO, however, the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption.

On June 13, 2024, the Criminal Court in Skopje halted the proceedings, citing the controversial amendments to the Criminal Code adopted by the government of SDSM and DUI. The case had been conducted against businessman Tome Glavchev, current president of the Basketball Federation of Macedonia; Ratko Dimitrovski, former mayor of Kochani from VMRO-DPMNE; and the lawyer Zoran Shuklev.

They were prosecuted on charges of abuse of official position and money laundering. The oversight established that the Criminal Court’s decision did not specify under which article of the Criminal Procedure Code the proceedings had been terminated.

The Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption, dissatisfied with the ruling, filed an appeal, arguing that Glavchev, Dimitrovski, and Shuklev should at minimum face accountability for the offense of money laundering.

However, High Public Prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski waived the right to pursue the appeal before the Court of Appeal. He justified this decision through an official note, yet the oversight concluded that the reasons given for withdrawing the appeal were contradictory and unclear.

“Public Prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli believe that by withdrawing the appeal of the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption, the public prosecutor from the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office Skopje did not act professionally, expertly and legally,” the report states.

Prosecutor Dzelal Bajrami, however, assessed that Cvetanovski had acted within his competencies. With the appeal withdrawn, the Court of Appeal no longer had the opportunity to consider the case. The proceedings were effectively closed.

The second case concerns illegal construction in the village of Zelenikovo involving Dragan Pavlovik-Latas and his two brothers, Zvezdan and Srdzan Pavlovik. On July 4, 2019, the Criminal Court acquitted them of all charges. The same verdict was reached again during the retrial on July 18, 2022.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje filed an appeal. On October 10, 2023, the appeal was accepted and a hearing was scheduled before the Skopje Court of Appeal. On November 6, 2023, the case was formally presented at the Public Prosecutor’s Office. Present at the session were the then State Public Prosecutor Ljubomir Joveski, public prosecutors Ferat Elezi and Sonja Simovska, and high public prosecutors Mustafa Hajrullahi and Jovan Cvetanovski.

“The conclusion from the presentation was that the public prosecutor representing the case at the Court of Appeal should propose commissioning an expert examination to determine whether the actions taken in the construction works constituted preparatory acts and to establish the date when construction began. An expert witness should be summoned to the main hearing to clarify the open questions,” the oversight report from the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office states.

The very next day, the defense for the Pavlovik brothers submitted a new piece of evidence to the Court of Appeal — an expert report and opinion prepared by a defense-appointed expert witness. Cvetanovski requested that the hearing be postponed so he could cross-examine the expert. However, according to the oversight findings, what followed raised serious concerns.

“The public prosecutor at the hearing did not ask the questions he had previously announced in the record from November 7, 2024, and the questions that were posed did not elicit answers from the expert on the disputed issues raised during the presentation before the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of North Macedonia,” the report states.

Cvetanovski also failed to follow the instructions issued during the internal prosecutorial meeting at the prosecution office to commission an independent expert examination. Instead, he accepted the expert report submitted by the defense.

“The public prosecutor acted contrary to Article 37 of the Rulebook on Internal Operations of Public Prosecutor’s Offices, according to which the position and opinion adopted after the presentation are binding for the lower public prosecutor’s office,” prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli wrote in the oversight report.

However, the third member of the supervisory commission, Dzelal Bajrami, disagreed. He concluded that Cvetanovski had acted in accordance with the conclusions adopted during the presentation at the internal prosecutorial meeting.

The third case examined during the oversight concerns the “Serta” case, involving public tenders for cleaning government institutions. The case reached the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office after the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office filed an appeal against a decision of the Criminal Court.

When reviewing the indictment, the Criminal Court accepted the objections raised by the accused Spaso Gjorgiev and the company “Serta,” who were prosecuted for abuse of procedures in a public procurement call. On January 29, 2024, the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office appealed that decision.

It was in connection with this case that a report emerged of pressure being exerted on an official at the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office responsible for registration and allocation of cases. According to her testimony, she received instructions from the then head of the Higher Prosecutor’s Office, Mustafa Hajrullahi, indicating which prosecutor should be assigned to the case.

“For the ‘Serta’ case, I was told to register it and assign it to public prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski,” said Daniella Lape, an employee in the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office. Her testimony is included in the oversight report.

At the Court of Appeal hearing on April 9, 2024, high prosecutor Cvetanovski withdrew the appeal.

“An inspection of the official note dated April 9, 2024 shows that the public prosecutor analyzed the evidence attached to the indictment, which is contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, Articles 336 and 337, given the stage of the proceedings in which the case was at the time,” the oversight report states.

This interpretation is consistent with the Supreme Court's legal opinion issued on December 7, 2021, which states that the Council responsible for reviewing an indictment does not analyze the evidence or assess its quality. Its role is limited to determining whether evidence has been obtained unlawfully — an issue that should have been the focus of Cvetanovski’s argument.

“A judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia was issued in this case on September 11, 2024. In that ruling, the court established a violation of the law in favor of the defendants. The judgment further states that the violation committed by the Council reviewing the indictment could have been remedied if the high public prosecutor had not withdrawn the appeal,” the oversight document notes.

In their conclusions regarding this case, the public prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli wrote that by withdrawing the appeal, prosecutor Cvetanovski did not act professionally, competently, or in accordance with the law. They further stated that he engaged in an analysis of evidence and the existence of intent to commit a criminal offense — matters that fall within the exclusive authority of the court. Nevertheless, the public prosecutor Dzelal Bajrami again took the position that Jovan Cvetanovski had acted within the scope of his authority.

The fourth case selected for additional scrutiny also involved the prosecutor assigned Roman numeral II — Jovan Cvetanovski. At first glance, it appeared routine: a case concerning the illegal serving of alcoholic beverages to a minor.

The court in Negotino found Gjorgji Lazov, Ilija Vangelov, and the company DPTU “S.O.S. Obezbeduvanje (Security)” DOO Negotino guilty. The defendants challenged the verdict, filing an appeal that moved the case to the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje.

On February 3, 2023, the Skopje Court of Appeal overturned the ruling and returned the case for retrial. Prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski did not attend the public hearing at the appellate court, despite the fact that the Higher Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje had previously concluded that the defendants’ appeals were unfounded.

On May 8, 2023, the court in Negotino issued a new verdict, again finding the defendants guilty. The defendants once more appealed the decision.

“On August 23, 2023, the public prosecutor at the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje, Jovan Cvetanovski, submitted a written proposal KOŽ.no. 1187/23 to the Skopje Court of Appeal, proposing that the defendants’ appeals be rejected as unfounded,” the oversight report states.

In that submission, Cvetanovski argued that the retrial had been conducted in accordance with the appellate court’s instructions and that the deficiencies identified in the initial proceedings had been fully addressed.

Yet only months later, his position shifted.

“At the hearing on 26 December 2023, the public prosecutor withdrew the indictment. From the review of the Skopje Court of Appeal’s judgment, it is evident that no new evidence was presented during the hearing and nothing altered the factual situation compared to the moment when the written proposal had been submitted,” the oversight report notes.

On the same day — December 26, 2023 — Cvetanovski drafted an official note stating that he had withdrawn the indictment because there was insufficient evidence to support the criminal offense.

The three prosecutors who conducted the oversight — Lile Stefanova, Elvin Veli, and Dzhelal Bajrami — reached a rare point of consensus regarding this decision. In earlier cases examined during the oversight, Bajrami had taken the view that Cvetanovski’s actions fell within his legal authority. In this instance, however, he concluded otherwise.

“Public prosecutors Lile Stefanova, Elvin Veli and Dzhelal Bajrami believe that, taking into account the written proposals in both proceedings and the positions expressed in them, and in a situation where no new evidence was presented at the main hearing, by dropping the indictment the public prosecutor did not act professionally, expertly and legally,” the oversight report states.

Despite this joint assessment, the 20-page oversight report ultimately carried only two signatures — those of Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli.Dzhelal Bajrami did not sign the document, which was later submitted to then–State Public Prosecutor Ljupco Kocevski.

Attached to the report were Bajrami’s own official note, as well as a separate report from five employees describing how Mustafa Hajrullahi, while serving as head of the office, allegedly pressured them over the registration and allocation of cases within the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje.