Press "Enter" to skip to content

Innocent Debtors

With stolen identities and forged ID cards from Kosovo and Albania, perpetrators siphoned money from quick-loan companies in the country. Innocent citizens—among them mentally disabled individuals and displaced persons—were left to face the consequences of a crime they didn’t commit.  

Reported by: Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska

 

Marija Kostovska is a 44-year-old woman from Skopje who works in a well-known wholesale drugstore, or beauty shop. When her working day is over, she continues to work on a second job.

“I have never taken out a loan in my life,” says Marija, who works extra so that she does not have to go into debt with banks.

But even though she works two jobs to provide a decent life for her family, in May 2023 she received an unexpected phone call.

Photo: Marija Kostovska

It started with a phone call. A male voice informed Marija Kostovska that she had an outstanding debt with the financial company “M Cash.” He explained that she was behind on payments for a quick loan taken out in March 2023—two months earlier.

“At first, I thought it was a mistake,” Kostovska told IRL. “But then I realized someone had created a fake ID card using my personal information to take out quick loans.” 

The fake ID card used to take out loan from the finance companies

Alarmed by the telephone warning that she owed money for a loan she had never applied for or ever taken out, Maria reported the incident to the police. They advised her to obtain a report from the Macedonian Credit Bureau to confirm the claims.

But when Marija obtained her credit report, the reality was far more shocking. Loans in her name had been taken from seven financial companies, totaling 146,000 denars (nearly €2,500). The debts spanned “M Cash,” “SN Finance,” “Credisimo,” “Flex Credit,” “Tigo,” “Iute,” and “Monimax.”

“Almost all the money was withdrawn by the fraudster at Capital Bank, where she opened a transaction account on my name using the fake ID card. She managed to take about 120,000 denars from that account.”, Kostovska explained.

When Marija discovered that a fake ID card was being used—bearing her personal details but the photo of another woman—she began piecing together how the scam had worked and how “the fake Marija” managed to take out loans. Checking with telecommunications providers A1 and Telekom, she uncovered that two phone numbers had been registered in her name. These numbers were listed as contacts at finance companies, enabling the fraudsters to communicate and apply for loans in her name seamlessly. Marija’s story highlights the dark side of a system designed for convenience but ripe for abuse.

While Marija Kostovska, the police, and the prosecutor’s office investigated who had stolen her identity, the nightmare escalated. Orders from bailiffs began arriving at her home, demanding repayment for loans she had never taken.

Marija hired a lawyer to fight back, presenting evidence that she had been defrauded and that the prosecutor’s office was handling the case. Six of the financial companies involved agreed to pause their collection efforts during the investigation. But “SN Finance” refused to relent. Despite knowing that someone had used a fake ID card to take the loan, the company pursued Marija for full repayment.

In December 2023, enforcement proceedings began. Marija’s bank account was blocked, leaving her no choice but to start repaying a loan she never applied for. The original loan from “SN Finance” was around 30,000 denars, but the company calculated she would owe nearly three times that amount.By May, Marija had already paid 67,000 denars. Only then did “SN Finance” agree to pause collection efforts, but only temporarily, until the courts and prosecution could prove her innocence, i.e.she was deceived and that it was not she who took out the loans, but some fraudster with her fake ID card.

The tactics were chillingly precise. Fraudsters altered the victims’ addresses slightly—adding a number, letter, or a nearby street name—so the loans wouldn’t raise immediate suspicion. The only thing that was different was that for one victim, who was unemployed, the fraudsters even falsified employment records, creating the illusion of stable income in case the finance companies decide to check the employment status.

Fictitious Employment: A Gateway to Fraud

As the investigation into Marija Kostovska’s stolen identity unfolded, IRL uncovered a meticulously organized network of fraudsters. Their schemes extended beyond forged ID cards, involving the fictitious employment of unsuspecting citizens. This tactic exploited finance companies’ minimal loan approval checks, using false employment records as leverage for quick loans.

One victim of this elaborate scheme was Mile Kosteski, a 20-year-old from Skopje. In May 2022, without his knowledge, someone registered him as an employee of a company called “Tradepoint.” This false employment status became the gateway for fraudsters to access quick loans. Just one month later, i.e. by June 22, 2022, loans totaling 60,000 denars were taken out in Kosteski’s name across three finance companies—”Flex,” “Monimax,” and “Credisimo.” The fraudsters didn’t stop there; they also purchased a mobile phone under his name through “Telekom.”

For months, Kosteski remained unaware of his false employment or the debts being racked up in his name. The truth came to light in November 2022 when a letter from a notary arrived at his home, demanding repayment of the debts. Stunned, Kosteski realized he had been scammed. He had never applied for a single loan, let alone multiple quick loans, nor had he ever worked for “Tradepoint.”

IRL’s investigation into the fraudulent employment of Mile Kosteski uncovered a tangled web of companies and individuals tied to suspicious activities. The company where Kosteski was falsely employed, “Tradepoint,” was founded in November 2019 by Vasil Simonovski. Its management was initially under Marjan Dimovski. However, in June 2021, the company changed hands—it was gifted to Muhamed Nezirovski. A closer look into Nezirovski revealed that his registered residential address was the Inter-Municipal Center for Social Affairs in Skopje. When IRL inquired about him, the institution responded that he was most likely a child who had previously lived in some of the foster care group institutions and had not updated his ID card.

Notably, the subject employments at “Tradepoint” began shortly after Nezirovski assumed ownership of the company.

Digging deeper into the Central Register documents, IRL discovered that Marjan Dimovski, the former manager of “Tradepoint,” was also linked to several other companies:

  • “MD Trading”: Founded in June 2022, owned and managed by Dimovski.
  • “Mobi Lobby”: Established in November 2022, with Dimovski as both owner and manager.
  • “The Vault”: Registered at the same address as “Mobi Lobby,” with Dimovski as a manager and Dimitar Kratovski, a 30-year-old from Skopje, listed as the owner.

Documents provided by a whistleblower at the Employment Agency shed further light on these companies. Over 50 individuals were employed across the four entities linked to Dimovski. However, employment records revealed irregularities:

  • Some employees were registered and deregistered within a matter of days.
  • Others, like Mile Kosteski, remained on the payroll for up to two years, even though their employment was fraudulent.

“We went to the Employment Agency several times to deregister me, but they refused to do this without the signature of the owner or manager,” says Mile Kosteski. “In October of this year, the inspectorate gave me a letter stating that the company was fictitious and didn’t exist. I took the letter to the Employment Agency, and only then was I able to deregister.” 

Take 50-year-old Pance Georgievski from Skopje, for example. Pance, who suffers from a severe mental disability, spends more time in hospitals than at home. His mother, unaware of the fraud, discovered something was amiss when they visited their family doctor to obtain a prescription. “The doctor told us Pance was employed at MD Trading, and the company wasn’t paying his health insurance,”she recalls. Previously, Pance had been receiving state-funded healthcare as an unemployed individual.

The nightmare didn’t end there.

“That’s when letters from notaries and bailiffs started arriving,” she says. “I can’t pay that debt—I don’t have the money. Someone cheated Pance, but we have enough problems at home. We didn’t report it to the police. Realistically, I didn’t expect anyone to solve this.”

The pattern repeats with 57-year-old Zoran Todorovski and 27-year-old Fljurim Golic, both of whom have psychiatric diagnoses. Todorovski, who lives alone in Skopje’s Lisice neighborhood, relies entirely on the charity of neighbors to survive.

“The man is not well,” a neighbor says, speaking in hushed tones for fear of retaliation. “Once, he came back bruised and beaten. He said they forced him to take out a loan. I don’t even know if he got any of the money they borrowed in his name.”

The third man in question is Fljurim Golic, whose sister confirmed a grim reality. “I don’t know how many loans were taken out in his name or from how many companies,” she admits. “They gave him just 5,000 denars, and the rest was taken by the people who scammed him.”

All these victims, including Fljurim, were fictitiously employed by two companies: Tradepoint and MD Trading. The supposed owner and manager of MD Trading, Marjan Dimovski, claims he was scammed too. “I didn’t employ any of these people,” Dimovski tells IRL. His suspicions were piqued when a letter arrived at his home—the same address registered for MD Trading. The letter demanded that he withhold part of an employee’s salary to repay a debt.

“I immediately thought it was strange because I didn’t have any employees,” he explains. Alarmed, he visited the Employment Agency to request a list of registered employees under his company. “There were 12 names on the list,” Dimovski recounts. “Seven were deregistered either the same day they were registered or within a few days. The eighth person, whose salary I was supposed to withhold, was still listed as employed.”, explained further Dimovski at the meeting with the IRL journalists.

Dimovski obtained the list on October 12, 2023. The very next day, he went to the police to report that someone was falsely employing people under his company’s name.

Dimovski isn’t the only connection to this fraudulent activity. He reveals that he had a former business partner, Dimitar Kratovski, who had been a manager at one of his companies, The Vault.

Their partnership began when a company owned by Kratovski started maintaining the entrance of Dimovski’s building.

“They were a group of guys, eager and full of energy. They asked me to open a company for them—a mobile phone shop. I agreed, but I quickly realized they weren’t serious. They didn’t pay rent or bills, so I ended the cooperation,” Dimovski says.

When asked if he suspected anyone specific of deceiving him, Dimovski claims he told the police everything he knew. Regarding Kratovski, he says only this: “I’m familiar with his work.”

From Whistleblower to Fraud Suspect

The road to unraveling the intricate web of identity theft and quick-loan frauds led IRL journalists through hundreds of documents, hours of interviews with victims, and consultations with legal experts. Kratovski came onto the radar early in the investigation, flagged by an anonymous source.

Фотографија од Димитар Кратовски
Photo: Dimitar Kratovski

While IRL cannot reveal who or why this person pointed to Kratovski, protecting this individual’s identity was paramount. What was clear was that Kratovski might hold the key to exposing the mechanics of quick-loan fraud involving stolen identities and fake ID cards.

When IRL first approached Kratovski, he painted himself as an outsider with insider knowledge.Kratovski claimed he was not directly involved in the fraud but knew of people who were.

In the initial interview, his initial role was one of a whistleblower and he was filmed with his identity concealed. “The data on the defrauded people is usually taken from state institutions,” he revealed.

He went on to describe an organized network with operatives embedded within various institutions, including banks. The individuals whose photos were used on the forged ID cards, he said, often came from Serbia or Bulgaria, not Macedonia.

“This group doesn’t have a fixed structure,” Kratovski explained. “If one person is stopped, others step in. The scheme keeps growing—it’s never just a small operation.”

Months after the interview, as IRL continued its investigation, a startling turn of events unfolded: Dimitar Kratovski himself became a suspect in the prosecution’s fraud case. The once-guarded whistleblower was now under scrutiny.

When pressed about his potential role in fictitiously registering citizens in companies linked to his name, Kratovski firmly denied direct involvement.

“I never interacted with the defrauded people or took money from them,” he stated. “I’ve always been in the background. I’ve seen what’s happening and who’s doing it. It’s not that I haven’t been close to it—directly or indirectly—but I’ve never been an advocate for fraud.” 

In addition to his company “The Vault,” IRL uncovered several other businesses connected to Dimitar Kratovski, where he was or still is listed as an owner. Initially approached as a source to explain how these fraud schemes operated, evidence later pointed to Kratovski as the mastermind behind the network of loan frauds involving forged IDs and fake employment records.

This conclusion aligns with the findings of an ongoing pre-investigation by the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje. Prosecutors suspect Kratovski and several associates of exploiting stolen identities to siphon money from the quick loans providing finance institutions.

Months after IRL identified the companies and associates linked to Kratovski, journalists confronted him again with allegations of his central role in the operation. Kratovski denied any involvement.

“My client has never personally been involved, nor has he incited others to deceive, defraud, or cause harm to individuals for financial or material gain, either personal or for others,” stated a letter sent to IRL by Kratovski’s lawyer. 

The letter also emphasized that Kratovski was fully cooperating with the Prosecutors, ready to clarify any uncertainties and answer their questions.

IRL’s investigation revealed that this was not Kratovski’s first run-in with the law. He and his associates were also implicated in another high-profile case known as “Chain.” In this scheme, individuals were charged with money laundering, organized crime, and tax evasion. According to the indictment, Kratovski was responsible for identifying fake legal entities and creating new companies to generate fraudulent claims against the Public Revenue Office. In the “Chain” case, Kratovski pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three years in prison. However, he evaded capture until this summer.

After Dimitar Kratovski’s arrest, the police and the Prosecutor’s Office expanded their investigation, suspecting him of involvement in the widespread quick-loan fraud scheme. The Prosecutor’s Office confirmed to IRL that the criminal group responsible used two primary methods to deceive citizens and finance institutions.

The first method involved creating fraudulent identities by combining stolen personal data. According to Gavril Bubevski, head of the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje, scammers would mix information from different people—using the ID details of one individual and the photo of another—to apply for and secure loans.“In some cases, the victims were citizens whose identities were exploited. In others, where the fraudsters couldn’t repay the loans, the financial companies themselves became the victims,” Bubevski explained in an interview with IRL.

The second method revolved around falsified employment documents. Vulnerable citizens were targeted, offered small compensation to participate in the scheme. They were unwittingly used to apply for loans with forged employment verification documents.

“Most of these participants belong to vulnerable categories. Sadly, they never receive the money; they only apply with fake documentation, while the real beneficiaries are those currently under investigation. Both the Ministry of Interior and the Prosecutor’s Office are closing in on the evidence and those involved,” added Bubevski.

So far, the pre-investigation has identified three primary suspects, but authorities believe more individuals are involved. Prosecutors are confident they will find evidence to implicate at least one additional person.

 

Sashka Cvetkovska

Sashka Cvetkovska

Еditor-in-chief

Sashka Cvetkovska is an internationally awarded investigative journalist and editor-in-chief of the Investigative Reporting Lab. Cvetkovska has worked on a number of national and cross-border investigations that have uncovered domestic and international crime, corruption, illicit arms trafficking and disinformation wars. The research she has worked on has been published in The Guardian, Buzzfeed, Süddeutsche Zeitung and others. Her current responsibilities are focused on increasing the impact of investigative reporting by creating new narratives of stories through film and campaigns. In that direction, she currently holds the position of producer of the Investigative documentary series Newsroom. For ten years, Cvetkovska has been part of the research team of the International Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, an international media organization associated with IRL. She was a member of the Board of Directors of OCCRP and the Association of Journalists of Macedonia.

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska

Editor for Development and Operations

Elena Mitrevska Cuckovska is the co-founder of IRL and together with the editor and his assistant, is responsible for monitoring and designing the implementation process of IRL activities. She is the project director of the documentary series Newsroom. She has been working with journalists for more than 10 years and has also worked on other technological solutions that allow more efficiency when searching public databases used by our reporters in order to make their work faster. She is a software engineer and graphic designer by profession and she is also the first technology expert who is trained and works in the field of media. She is part of the cross-border group of technological experts of OCCRP and contributes in collecting and analyzing information and as a researcher in IRL.

Bojan Stojanovski

Bojan Stojanovski

Editor and journalist

Bojan Stojanovski is a graduated journalist with over ten years of media experience. He worked in several national televisions – TV Alfa, TV 24 Vesti and TV Alsat. From first of November 2021, he is a part of the IRL team. Throughout his career, Stojanovski followed topics in the field of judiciary, crime, corruption. In 2013, he received “Nikola Mladenov” award for investigative journalism, on the topic “Employment in the public administration through the party list”.


Denica Chadikovska

Denica Chadikovska

Assistant managing editor for organization and communications

Denica Chadikovska is a graduated psychologist who started her journalistic career in 2017 as co-author and co-producer of the youth show Krik, funded by the UK Government. Chadikovska becomes part of the IRL team in 2018 as an investigative journalist – intern within the project for training future media leaders. In June 2020, she joins the position of communications officer in charge of implementing the IRL’s communications strategy as part of the communications and products team.

Maja Jovanovska

Maja Jovanovska

Researcher and journalist

Maja Jovanovska has a degree in journalism and follows topics in the field of corruption, crime and justice. In her long-term career, she worked in numerous media such as A1 television, Channel 5 television, Alsat and the NOVAtv portal before joining the founding board of IRL in 2018. She is the winner of domestic recognitions and awards and has participated in a number of trainings and conferences in the field of investigative journalism. She was a member of the management of the Independent Union of Journalists and Media Workers of Macedonia and the Council of Ethics in the Media in Macedonia, and is currently part of the management of ZNM.


Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska

Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska

Researcher and journalist

Aleksandra Denkovska Gocevska is a graduated journalist with ten years of experience. She worked in the daily newspaper Nova Makedonija, the Meta.mk news agency and the NOVATV portal. During her career, she worked on topics from the field of politics, urbanism, judiciary and corruption. She started working with investigative journalism in 2015 when she came to work as a reporter in the investigative newsroom of NOVATV. She is a participant in dozens of conferences and workshops on investigative journalism and is the author of the first undercover investigative story in Macedonia about the lives of the children from the May 25 home.

Aleksandar Janev

Aleksandar Janev

Researcher and journalist

Aleksandar Janev is a graduated economist who began his career as an economic journalist in 2008 at Alfa Television. He developed his professional reporting skills through training sessions with top economic journalists both domestically and abroad, including at Reuters in the United Kingdom. In 2010, he transitioned to the print media at Capital, where he worked until 2022. Concurrently, he contributed regularly to the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN), and since 2018, he has been both an author and editor for the TV program “Agenda 35” broadcasted on Macedonian Radio Television. Since 2023, he has been a part of the IRL team focusing on corruption and economic crime.

Ivan Blazhevski

Ivan Blazhevski

Researcher and journalist

Ivan Blazhevski is a journalist specializing in international relations, crime, and corruption. He has been working as a journalist since 1998, and since 2001, he has been an editor and correspondent for the Spanish state news agency EFE covering Macedonia, Albania, and Kosovo. Throughout his extensive career, Blazhevski has contributed to numerous media outlets such as Makpress, Agence France-Presse (AFP), Vecer, Dnevnik, Vreme, and Radio Free Europe, serving as editor for news and documentary programs at TV ALSAT for 18 years. He joined the team at IRL in 2024. Blazhevski has been honored with an investigative journalism award from the Macedonian Institute for Media (MIM) and has produced television programs in multiple countries and regions, including Japan, Greenland, Bolivia, China, Nepal, Bangladesh, East Africa, Cuba, Peru, Denmark, Italy, Germany, among others.

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova

Researcher and journalist

Pelagija Mladenovska Stojančova is a journalist with over 16 years of experience in the media industry. She began her career at the daily newspaper “Shpic” in 2008 and later worked at the weekly “Sega”. Since 2009, she has been part of the team at Radio Free Europe’s Macedonian language service, reporting on politics, crime, corruption, and economics across various media platforms. Since 2024, she has been employed at IRL as an investigative journalist. She holds a degree from the Faculty of Philosophy and continued her education at the School of Journalism at the Macedonian Institute for Media (MIM). Throughout her career, she has been involved in projects focused on educating and mentoring young journalists.

Luka Blazev

Luka Blazev

Graphic designer

Luka Blazev is a graphic designer at IRL who becomes part of the team in 2019. His career in the field of graphic design and art began in 2017 by working on several projects for various domestic and foreign companies. At IRL, Blazev is in charge of finding graphic solutions for the research and for the design of the promotional content resulting from the research, which follows the communication strategy of IRL.

Trifun Sitnikovski

Trifun Sitnikovski

Director of "Newsroom"

Trifun Sitnikovski has been working in the film industry for more than a decade. He has shot more than a dozen short action films, short documentaries and three TV series on which he worked as screenwriter, director and executive producer. In addition to directing films, he has also worked on numerous projects as a producer, editor, cinematographer, assistant director and script supervisor for short films, TV shows, documentaries, commercials and music videos. His latest project as a director and screenwriter is the documentary series “Newsroom”.

Trajce Antonovski

Trajce Antonovski

Cinematographer

Trajce Antonovski is a cameraman and part of the cinematographers of the documentary series Newsroom. Antonovski has been working for more than 10 years on the visual realization of sports competitions under the auspices of UEFA and EHF. He worked in the newsroom of A1 and the NOVATV portal, and was part of the team for the realization of the political shows “Eurozum”, “Provereno”, as well as numerous entertainment projects such as the popular quiz “Who wants to be a millionaire”, “50-50 ” and other projects. In IRL Macedonia, he is part of the team in charge of filming the stories.

Gorjan Atanasov

Gorjan Atanasov

Video editor and producer

Gorjan Atanasov is a film and TV video editor with more than 8 years of experience in the film and television industry. Atanasov has worked on several features and documentary projects. As an editor, he has signed 6 short feature films, 2 feature-length documentaries, and currently he works in IRL as a video editor for the documentary series “Newsroom” and short video stories and multimedia projects of the organization.

The “Postal Bank” case dates back more than two decades. For just as long, investigators have examined the privatization of the country’s first state bank. The case was reopened in 2018 by the then Special Public Prosecutor’s Office (SPO). After the dissolution of the SPO, however, the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption.

On June 13, 2024, the Criminal Court in Skopje halted the proceedings, citing the controversial amendments to the Criminal Code adopted by the government of SDSM and DUI. The case had been conducted against businessman Tome Glavchev, current president of the Basketball Federation of Macedonia; Ratko Dimitrovski, former mayor of Kochani from VMRO-DPMNE; and the lawyer Zoran Shuklev.

They were prosecuted on charges of abuse of official position and money laundering. The oversight established that the Criminal Court’s decision did not specify under which article of the Criminal Procedure Code the proceedings had been terminated.

The Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption, dissatisfied with the ruling, filed an appeal, arguing that Glavchev, Dimitrovski, and Shuklev should at minimum face accountability for the offense of money laundering.

However, High Public Prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski waived the right to pursue the appeal before the Court of Appeal. He justified this decision through an official note, yet the oversight concluded that the reasons given for withdrawing the appeal were contradictory and unclear.

“Public Prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli believe that by withdrawing the appeal of the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office for the Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption, the public prosecutor from the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office Skopje did not act professionally, expertly and legally,” the report states.

Prosecutor Dzelal Bajrami, however, assessed that Cvetanovski had acted within his competencies. With the appeal withdrawn, the Court of Appeal no longer had the opportunity to consider the case. The proceedings were effectively closed.

The second case concerns illegal construction in the village of Zelenikovo involving Dragan Pavlovik-Latas and his two brothers, Zvezdan and Srdzan Pavlovik. On July 4, 2019, the Criminal Court acquitted them of all charges. The same verdict was reached again during the retrial on July 18, 2022.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje filed an appeal. On October 10, 2023, the appeal was accepted and a hearing was scheduled before the Skopje Court of Appeal. On November 6, 2023, the case was formally presented at the Public Prosecutor’s Office. Present at the session were the then State Public Prosecutor Ljubomir Joveski, public prosecutors Ferat Elezi and Sonja Simovska, and high public prosecutors Mustafa Hajrullahi and Jovan Cvetanovski.

“The conclusion from the presentation was that the public prosecutor representing the case at the Court of Appeal should propose commissioning an expert examination to determine whether the actions taken in the construction works constituted preparatory acts and to establish the date when construction began. An expert witness should be summoned to the main hearing to clarify the open questions,” the oversight report from the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office states.

The very next day, the defense for the Pavlovik brothers submitted a new piece of evidence to the Court of Appeal — an expert report and opinion prepared by a defense-appointed expert witness. Cvetanovski requested that the hearing be postponed so he could cross-examine the expert. However, according to the oversight findings, what followed raised serious concerns.

“The public prosecutor at the hearing did not ask the questions he had previously announced in the record from November 7, 2024, and the questions that were posed did not elicit answers from the expert on the disputed issues raised during the presentation before the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of North Macedonia,” the report states.

Cvetanovski also failed to follow the instructions issued during the internal prosecutorial meeting at the prosecution office to commission an independent expert examination. Instead, he accepted the expert report submitted by the defense.

“The public prosecutor acted contrary to Article 37 of the Rulebook on Internal Operations of Public Prosecutor’s Offices, according to which the position and opinion adopted after the presentation are binding for the lower public prosecutor’s office,” prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli wrote in the oversight report.

However, the third member of the supervisory commission, Dzelal Bajrami, disagreed. He concluded that Cvetanovski had acted in accordance with the conclusions adopted during the presentation at the internal prosecutorial meeting.

The third case examined during the oversight concerns the “Serta” case, involving public tenders for cleaning government institutions. The case reached the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office after the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office filed an appeal against a decision of the Criminal Court.

When reviewing the indictment, the Criminal Court accepted the objections raised by the accused Spaso Gjorgiev and the company “Serta,” who were prosecuted for abuse of procedures in a public procurement call. On January 29, 2024, the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office appealed that decision.

It was in connection with this case that a report emerged of pressure being exerted on an official at the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office responsible for registration and allocation of cases. According to her testimony, she received instructions from the then head of the Higher Prosecutor’s Office, Mustafa Hajrullahi, indicating which prosecutor should be assigned to the case.

“For the ‘Serta’ case, I was told to register it and assign it to public prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski,” said Daniella Lape, an employee in the Skopje Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office. Her testimony is included in the oversight report.

At the Court of Appeal hearing on April 9, 2024, high prosecutor Cvetanovski withdrew the appeal.

“An inspection of the official note dated April 9, 2024 shows that the public prosecutor analyzed the evidence attached to the indictment, which is contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, Articles 336 and 337, given the stage of the proceedings in which the case was at the time,” the oversight report states.

This interpretation is consistent with the Supreme Court's legal opinion issued on December 7, 2021, which states that the Council responsible for reviewing an indictment does not analyze the evidence or assess its quality. Its role is limited to determining whether evidence has been obtained unlawfully — an issue that should have been the focus of Cvetanovski’s argument.

“A judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia was issued in this case on September 11, 2024. In that ruling, the court established a violation of the law in favor of the defendants. The judgment further states that the violation committed by the Council reviewing the indictment could have been remedied if the high public prosecutor had not withdrawn the appeal,” the oversight document notes.

In their conclusions regarding this case, the public prosecutors Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli wrote that by withdrawing the appeal, prosecutor Cvetanovski did not act professionally, competently, or in accordance with the law. They further stated that he engaged in an analysis of evidence and the existence of intent to commit a criminal offense — matters that fall within the exclusive authority of the court. Nevertheless, the public prosecutor Dzelal Bajrami again took the position that Jovan Cvetanovski had acted within the scope of his authority.

The fourth case selected for additional scrutiny also involved the prosecutor assigned Roman numeral II — Jovan Cvetanovski. At first glance, it appeared routine: a case concerning the illegal serving of alcoholic beverages to a minor.

The court in Negotino found Gjorgji Lazov, Ilija Vangelov, and the company DPTU “S.O.S. Obezbeduvanje (Security)” DOO Negotino guilty. The defendants challenged the verdict, filing an appeal that moved the case to the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje.

On February 3, 2023, the Skopje Court of Appeal overturned the ruling and returned the case for retrial. Prosecutor Jovan Cvetanovski did not attend the public hearing at the appellate court, despite the fact that the Higher Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje had previously concluded that the defendants’ appeals were unfounded.

On May 8, 2023, the court in Negotino issued a new verdict, again finding the defendants guilty. The defendants once more appealed the decision.

“On August 23, 2023, the public prosecutor at the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje, Jovan Cvetanovski, submitted a written proposal KOŽ.no. 1187/23 to the Skopje Court of Appeal, proposing that the defendants’ appeals be rejected as unfounded,” the oversight report states.

In that submission, Cvetanovski argued that the retrial had been conducted in accordance with the appellate court’s instructions and that the deficiencies identified in the initial proceedings had been fully addressed.

Yet only months later, his position shifted.

“At the hearing on 26 December 2023, the public prosecutor withdrew the indictment. From the review of the Skopje Court of Appeal’s judgment, it is evident that no new evidence was presented during the hearing and nothing altered the factual situation compared to the moment when the written proposal had been submitted,” the oversight report notes.

On the same day — December 26, 2023 — Cvetanovski drafted an official note stating that he had withdrawn the indictment because there was insufficient evidence to support the criminal offense.

The three prosecutors who conducted the oversight — Lile Stefanova, Elvin Veli, and Dzhelal Bajrami — reached a rare point of consensus regarding this decision. In earlier cases examined during the oversight, Bajrami had taken the view that Cvetanovski’s actions fell within his legal authority. In this instance, however, he concluded otherwise.

“Public prosecutors Lile Stefanova, Elvin Veli and Dzhelal Bajrami believe that, taking into account the written proposals in both proceedings and the positions expressed in them, and in a situation where no new evidence was presented at the main hearing, by dropping the indictment the public prosecutor did not act professionally, expertly and legally,” the oversight report states.

Despite this joint assessment, the 20-page oversight report ultimately carried only two signatures — those of Lile Stefanova and Elvin Veli.Dzhelal Bajrami did not sign the document, which was later submitted to then–State Public Prosecutor Ljupco Kocevski.

Attached to the report were Bajrami’s own official note, as well as a separate report from five employees describing how Mustafa Hajrullahi, while serving as head of the office, allegedly pressured them over the registration and allocation of cases within the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Skopje.